Sustainable Forestry

21st century challenges demand 21st century solutions.

By modernizing our logging laws and embracing climate smart forestry, Oregon can revitalize rural jobs while simultaneously protecting the many benefits that our forests provide.

Many small scale foresters in Oregon are adopting sustainable forestry practices with future generations of foresters in mind. 

What Oregon Needs to Do To Protect Future Forests and Jobs

  • By limiting industrial logging in drinking watersheds, Oregonians around the state can ensure their watersheds provide low-cost, abundant clean water into the future.
  • Many cities around the state have proactively protected their watersheds from clearcut-plantation forestry; however, most rural communities in western Oregon remain vulnerable to water quantity and quality issues caused by industrial logging.
  • As climate change increases our water challenges, we must modernize Oregon’s forest practices to protect forests’ natural ability to store, filter, and gradually release water all year round
  • Ecological forestry holds great potential to revitalize rural economies  while protecting water quality and safeguarding the other benefits that  our forests provide. Ecological foresters recognize forests as ecosystems, not tree farms, and manage forests to balance a wide variety of benefits –  such as watershed health, wood products, recreation, carbon storage, and wildlife habitat (Franklin, Johnson, and Johnson 2018). 
  • This approach is more labor-intensive than modern industrial logging,  which actually translates into more jobs. For example, instead of one logger operating a feller-buncher to clearcut an entire stand of trees, ecological forestry relies on teams of trained foresters who make informed  decisions about what is harvested and what is left standing.
  • Ecological forestry usually entails letting trees grow for 70-80 years –  instead of 35-40 years – before harvesting. This not only produces higher  quality wood products, but also optimizes the wood-production capacity  of our forests and results in greater carbon storage (Diaz et al. 2018).  Responsible stewardship of Oregon’s forests can also help buffer frontline  communities and endangered species from droughts, wildfires, and other  extreme weather events in future years.
  • Currently, the vast majority of Oregon’s waterways receive no buffer from logging – this includes streams and creeks that run year round! The rivers and streams that do receive buffers are still not adequately protected from logging impacts.
  • In order to keep sediment levels and temperatures low in our streams and rivers, we must expand minimum no-logging buffers, and add buffers where they currently don’t exist. By updating Oregon’s protective buffers to align more closely with Washington’s buffers, we can improve water quality while ensuring the long-term viability of our wood-products industry.
  • Leaving more trees along rivers and streams not only protects important habitat for fish and wildlife, but also results in higher carbon storage on the landscape.
  • Currently, hundreds of Oregon’s rivers and creeks violate clean water standards, largely due to rampant clearcut logging and poor road standards.
  • Oregon should follow the lead of other states, like Washington, by improving standards for logging roads, which are major vectors for delivering sediment and debris to waterways. Oregon can also decrease the risk of landslide events by prohibiting clearcut logging in steep mountain slopes and unstable areas.
  • Providing no-cut buffers around Oregon’s headwater streams – which currently receive no protection – can also help improve water quality by reducing the amount of pollutants that reach waterways.
  •  In order to protect the health of rural communities, fish, and wildlife from the dangers of toxic pesticides, we need to limit the use of toxic chemicals near rivers, streams, and sources of drinking water.
  • Instead of relying on heavy pesticide-use, foresters should encourage diverse tree and plant life, which increases biodiversity and climate resilience in our forests.
  • More than 30 years ago, the Forest Service banned aerial spraying of herbicides in Oregon’s National Forests, and ever since has successfully regrown forests without using this dangerous practice.
  • Currently, Washington and California tax large industrial timber corporations and direct the revenue into paying for schools and roads in rural communities; however, 20 years ago timber industry lobbyists effectively eliminated Oregon’s severance tax – resulting in a dramatic reduction in funding for our rural communities (Oregonian and OPB article, June 2020).
  • By bringing back Oregon’s severance tax and requiring large corporations to pay their fair share, we can revitalize rural communities that have historically depended on this funding. Revenue can also be directed towards restoring watershed health, enforcing forest practices regulations, and educating the public about responsible forest stewardship.

Restoring our Carbon Debt

The mismanagement of Oregon’s forests
over the past century has transferred massive amounts of forest-carbon to the atmosphere, creating a “carbon debt” that we can only repay through improved forest practices.

  • Climate-smart forestry involves letting trees grow longer before logging  and leaving more trees behind after logging, which results in more  resilient forests and greater carbon storage than the current industrial  model. Research has found that forests in the Pacific Northwest adhering  to “Forest Stewardship Council” (FSC) standards store roughly 30% more  carbon than current forests practices (Diaz et al. 2018). 

    ■ Climate-smart forestry also helps protect rivers and streams, and provides  habitat for fish and wildlife. By supporting the companies that have  adopted truly sustainable logging practices we can safeguard the multiple  benefits that our forests provide while also ensuring the long-term viability  of Oregon’s wood-products industry. 

Pacific Northwest Forests store carbon per acre than almost any other ecosystem in the world. This chart shows how the current industrial timber practices have released much of that carbon into the atmosphere.